Allowing pornified women in society forces all women, consciously or subconsciously, to compete with that behaviour, thus turning all women degenerate. This is the practical and rational reason for the ostracism of promiscuous women: to avoid a race to the bottom for all women.
Neither an excess in sexual repression nor an overindulgence in sexual promiscuity is conducive to the construction of a society that nurtures great art, great romance and healthy children. The most significant temptation for both men and women is in the realm of sexuality. There are moral and immoral sexual behaviours and this morality serves the purpose of making society more hospitable to love, to family and to children.
Mankind has both higher and lower states of being and vice is the encouragement of those base instincts while ignoring the higher ones. Virtue is the recognition of the base instincts and integrating their motivations to higher endeavours. For example sexual desire itself is not negative and is an important element of true romance, however if mobilised incorrectly it can sabotage a person’s very soul. The most heinous form of sabotage occurs when the sexual instinct is directed toward an unnatural object such as an image on a screen.
While prostitution has existed across cultures and time, it is only recently that the prostitute (the hoe) has enjoyed social approbation at the level that we see today. Rather than the fallen woman being shunned to the outskirts of society and seedy alleyways in the bad part of town, she now permeates the every day attention of ordinary men and women when they simply open the social media apps that comprise the primary medium of social interaction today.
It cannot be overstated how dangerous this is for society.
If the purpose of society is to build wonderful things, and to be a safe and good place to raise children, then the purpose of society is undermined by the social approbation of promiscuous women.
How does this happen? I explain below: