Why have we gone from Arthur to Amelia?
The Problem with Women Leading Political Movements
Recently, a new powerful meme has taken over the “right wing” circles on the internet and that is the purple-haired shield maiden named, Amelia. She is the cute goth girl with the pretty face generated completely by AI. She is instantly recognizable and yet can be iterated infinitely. The reason she is so powerful is that she is not linked to any one person’s identity and so no one can be “caught” and held liable for the things she says and represents.
Although a woman like Eva Vlaardingerbroek can be banned from the UK for criticizing Kier Starmer’s negligence to put an end to the rape gangs terrorizing little girls in England, Lucy Connelly can be thrown in jail for complaining about mass migration on twitter, and several others can be arrested for social media posts, Amelia cannot because Amelia is not human.
Amelia is insulated therefore from the many punishments used to deter political conversation and dissent in the western world. The UK is not unique, Canada frequently removes people’s bank accounts for disagreeing with the government in peaceful protests such as during the 2021 trucker protest in Ottawa. Australia, France, New Zealand and many other western countries behave in much the same tyrannical way.
However, we must ask ourselves why there are so many women are the face of the resistance movement against tyranny and the oppression of the ordinary, God-fearing family. From Georgia Meloni in Italy to Eva Vlaar in the Netherlands, to Riley Gains and Erika Kirk in America, we must ask ourselves why there are no men at the heads of these movements.
The west has the cultural problems of the promulgation of ugliness and immorality everywhere, there are the political problems to do with the disenfranchisement of the ordinary, law abiding citizen in favour of violent criminals, there are the economic problems of rapacious taxation even as the quality of life of the ordinary person is degraded, and there are the racial problems of a system that denigrates and discriminates systematically against white people in their own native countries. In fact, this goes beyond race, because there is a concerted effort to change human societies, nation states, to mere economic zones that are primarily organized to serve the ends of mega-corporations.
I argue that the Modern Western World has many problems but feminism is it’s primary one and the main reason why we can’t fight the rest of them.
The case has been made that feminism presents any benefit at all to anyone, it is a benefit to men because feminism necessarily requires women take on the risks and burdens that men are meant to carry.
When I see a little girl in armour at the fore-front of a political movement, I am not moved and excited by it, I am disgusted. It is a sign of great decline and depravity in a society if little girls are wearing armour because it can only mean that all the men have died or become so impotent that they’ve left the girls to defend themselves. Their foes certainly will not be little girls, that’s for certain.
With the conversation these days circling on the transgender movement and how inappropriate and dangerous it is for girls to compete against boys in sport, it is surprising then, that the “right wing” cannot see the direct implications of this idea in the political fight as well. Girls should not be fighting our wars.
We who spend so much time online, can be lulled into the false perception that the fight is only about writing pithy words online and making incisive insights on video online. Eva Vlaar is very good at this as was Lauren Southern once upon a time. But if we are to learn anything from the sordid tale of Miss Southern it is this: the real fight is about more than just these rhetorical arguments made online. In the real world, there are real physical consequences that are not only to be tolerated, but to be delivered to one’s enemies. Girls are excellent keyboard warriors, I should know, I’m one of them. But we should not be duped by our extremely online society, and the idiotic Hollywood movies depicting “girl boss kicks ass” where a 110lb girl knocks out three grown men, that this has any bearing on reality.
Renee Nicole Good, although a leftist protesting for the “rights of somali frauds to continue doing crime in America” died for her cause. She tried to run an ICE agent over with her car in January 2026, and for this, she was shot and killed. While this was completely justified, it horrified many people because it was the first time that political women were made to realise consequences that women are normally insulated from. Right-wing women leading their own political causes should do well to take notes from this incident as well. There is little difference between leftist women taking their babies to protests and right wing women taking their babies to political conferences as we saw Riley Gains do recently.
But the question remains, why do, right wing women lead the charge? What are the men doing? The answer is very simple: the men are getting shot. The war is already hot. It’s not “ramping up” it’s already here. Charlie Kirk would not have been shot at unless he was a man. Erika Kirk’s femininity offers her a level of safety against the violence, a vestigial protection that, as evidenced by the Renee Good incident, will certainly not last much longer as a protection.
Everywhere there are female leaders because they are less offensive and more palatable to the ugly tyrannical regime. They do not want men leading out movements because a man is genuinely threatening. Do we not want to threaten our enemies anymore? Shouldn’t the goal be to make them afraid? If Charlie Kirk frightened the leftists, we should have gotten another Man to replace him, not a poorly media trained, newly grieved widow with two young babies at home. If Eva Vlaar were a Man, she would have already been arrested. Donald Trump is one of the few men leading the right wing movement and he has already been shot at and escaped miraculously with his life.
I’m sure there are many men behind the scenes. There is an argument to be made that women ought to be the faces of movements because they are inspiring to men. But women are not as inspiring to men as another admirable, well spoken, courageous and formidable man is to other men.
If Amelia had been a Arthur instead. If instead of a purple haired goth girl, we had a fourteen year old english lad, finally standing up to the vile state that keeps him purposely disenfranchised, subjugated and told he is evil every day, even as they steal his inheritance and his birth right…imagine how much more dangerous and inspiring he could be. It is not the girls who need a voice but the boys.
We do not need another little girl dressing up in armour, playing pretend and then running away and saying “I’m just a girl” when the fight gets rough. We need boys and men to be supported in defending themselves, and defending the world we hold so dear, for real. Let us support these men. Let us help them WIN.
