Female figures have been the avatars of ideas for a very long time. "Lady justice" is a female personification of law, and existed even when the field was exclusively men. In no way does she indicate that women should be running the judicial system.
I think Amelia is a creature like that. A muse. She doesn't indicate that women should be taking a stand and doing what she does in the memes... she's just doing what female personifications have done for centuries - represent an idea while looking pretty (probably, at least partially, to help make the idea naturally more attractive, though I think there's a lot more to the whole female allegory thing that I don't understand.)
She's also deliciously ironic, because the leftists designed and wrote her. A character created by the right wingers doesn't have any of the power that Amelia does, because she was theirs and they accidentally created a sweetheart for their enemies. That kind of symbol has power, and that's why the memes are flowing like wine.
The flesh and blood women acting as the face of resistance and revolution is wrong - I agree with you completely there. But when it comes to symbolic images that take female form, I think that is something else entirely.
Thought provoking. As someone who has not been shy about discussing the need for men to be out in front of women and protecting them, I largely agree, although I think there are far more men than President Trump attempting to lead on these issues. And he isn’t even really a conservative.
Couple of random thoughts:
When men attempt to lead on these issues, they are widely discounted, decried as preservers of the “patriarchy,” and thus ignored. We live in a time when people think you have nothing relevant to say to an issue unless you belong to the group being most affected. It’s why, for example, pro-life men like me are dismissed because we “don’t have a uterus and thus cannot speak to such matters.” It makes it far more difficult for conservative men to get the attention and traction necessary to be heard.
I think this may be why conservatives have pivoted to women to be the face of the “counter-resistance,” if you will. Not saying it’s right; but it is a strategy. And it does make logical sense in the modern context. Of course, it adopts a false paradigm itself — that we are all members of a group that is either oppressor or oppressed and only the oppressed have authority to speak to their situation.
But men — to your point — must be willing to repeatedly charge into the arena anyway. I see many that do (but they get very little widespread attention).
Women in combat? Absolutely not. And that includes flying planes.
Abortion? Murder. Doesn’t matter who you are.
Males in female sports? No way. We are built very differently and it’s dangerous for women/girls.
Women as ass kicking gladiators in movies/TV? Huh uh. 🙄 It feeds dangerous delusions.
Men in women’s spaces? Nope. There are countless predators out there seeking to harm women, and even the innocent ones are encroaching in a way that makes women feel emotionally and physically unsafe.
Modern Feminism? Destructive philosophy that must be destroyed.
Pornography, human trafficking, physical abuse of women? Put a stop to it. All of it.
Well, actually, I think the research is a mixed bag on that and inconclusive. Men’s better upper body and neck strength make them better capable of keeping their head upright against the strain of high Gs and higher muscle mass helps with sustained muscle strain.
But the point isn’t whether a woman CAN do it; it’s about whether we SHOULD be putting them in harms way. What kind of society are we if we throw women out in front of men in combat? If we expose them to risk of capture, death, and maiming?
The best part about Amelia is the UK government used her to push anti conservative rhetoric and it completely backfired. Conservative girls can learn a lot about this. I keep telling women about the odd obsession trad men have with the liberal feminine look and no one understands it... literally went viral.
Amelia is great - the spirit and the irony. However, in real life, I would steer men far away from the liberal feminine look. If Amelia was a real woman she would bring trouble into a man’s life. I understand what you are saying, there’s sexual energy in the Amelia persona, but in real life she is undisciplined, neurotic, and rebellious, so, there’s that.
Youre making too many assumptions based on insecurities and on a fictional character, while negating the rebellion occurring in conservative women, too. If men like that look and you refuse to have it, then you are being rebellious and you too are beinf insolent against men.
Its self explanatory. You are telling men to steer away.... attraction doesnt work that way. It's not logical. What is logical is your choice to deny men what they like.
I look young but im not. Just because youre Christian and keep your regular hair color... it doesn't mean youre not insolent. Based on what you are writing, just a load of assumptions, youre insolent yourself. Your conservative values are absolutely useless if youre arguing with men and not following their lead and knowingly denying them what they like.
I believe Amelia to be a lot like Joan of Arc - as in, she's a female voice leading the masses, an idea, in that much like Joan wasn't seen by majority of frenchmen at the time personally but represented a movement of freemen, in the same way Amelia is a personalized idea of someone influencing people to move and fight. It's not like she could be an actual leader, she is an idea and that's all she'll ever be, a symbol.
Amelia is a psyop to get men to stick their heads above the parapet. No thank-you, we haven’t been maligned for decades by the likes of Amelia to all of a sudden be fooled by her trad conversion when things get hot. No, we will be patient and bide our time and when the system collapses we will rise.
Marvelous to say, Amelia appeared on the scene (or, should I say 'screen') in a week when I listened to the episodes of 'The Rest is History' that told the story of Joan of Arc.
Yes, but Amelia is a personification - like Britannia’s granddaughter. Plus hypothetical based girls are traditionally important for morale, as it’s nice to think someone really appreciates the sacrifices made to resist.
Of course, we’re not the same as WWII veterans, but the struggle is still a struggle.
Men are walking away, from the crazy feminist women and from society. They are finally going Galt, and when society collapses we will be rid of all this nonsense because all the crazy feminists will be Darwin Award winners. They have already lost, they are just too stupid to understand it yet.
As for Amelia, I find the whole thing to be hilarious, and a sure sign that we have already won.
Amelia is a supporting character in the U.K. government-funded educational visual novel Pathways, a game developed by Shout Out UK to teach the youth about extremism and radicalization. In the game, Amelia is depicted as a far-right anti-immigration activist with purple hair, a pink dress, a purple sweater and a goth or e-girl appearance, who tries persuading the protagonist to join her cause. The video game was purportedly released in 2023 and generated online discourse in January 2026 as far-right social media users reclaimed the character as their own, inspiring positive fan art and memes based around Amelia.
In 2023, Shout Out UK, a company focused on spreading media literacy, political literacy and more via their training programs, released the visual novel "interactive learning package," Pathways. The game was funded by Prevent, a program of the British government's Home Office.
In the game, players take on the role of a character named Charlie in six different scenarios dealing with online or in-person radicalization.
Scenario two features the character Amelia, a far-right, purple-haired goth girl with anti-immigration views who tries to recruit Charlie into joining anti-immigration groups and protesting against immigration.
*****
The female aspect of it is more coincidental than purposeful I believe, as the character was originally part of a propaganda campaign "to teach the youth about extremism and radicalization," however it backfired spectacularly -- as many people who played the game -- agreed with the anti-immigrant message pushed by the Amelia character. 🤣
The reason I see Amelia not going away anytime soon, is because *she’s quite literally everything that the left can’t effectively propagandize against.*
The Amelia meme has an heir of truthfulness to it -- and it’s funny.
The left hates humor as they are *always* serious, and always *very serious indeed.*
I think we’re going to be seeing Amelia a lot more, and perhaps even an American version. She can go on about the Somali Daycare Pirates™ and other immigration-based institutional fraud schemes in the US. 😉👉
I am old and not plugged into the Gen Z-eitgeist, so I had to have this emergent phenomenon explained to me by the always-brilliant John Carter at Postcards from Barsoom: https://substack.com/inbox/post/184828993
Geez, you people are still talking about Charlie Kirk? No one cared about him, and if anything you people made fun of his "milquetoast conservatism" right up until he was killed.
Also that poor woman in Minnesota was shot through her side window by a cowardly, poorly-trained ICE agent. Did you even watch the video? You should be ashamed.
He wouldn't have been publicly assassinated then mocked in countless videos by extreme leftists if he was unimportant. His accounts had enough followers and views to prove that many people approved of his content. His boomer conservatism as a millennial wasn't that off-putting to other Christian conservatives.
As for Renee Good, I found the first shot 100% justified. The other 3 shots did seem like excessive force. I personally don't attend protests because I'm aware of the risks involving law enforcement, counter-protesters, and rioting (molotovs, property damage, and theft). She and her wife took that risk, and then she experienced a negative consequence.
I honestly believe that she thought her "white privilege" would protect her political stance. There's a lot of political fatigue around left-wing protesting in the US. Everyone is fair game now, including women. 🎯 And, no, this isn't something I would ever want, but this is a result of years of trying to prove that women are equal to men. Well, it succeeded.
I think Amelia is cute. Also, the Left uses foids as tools of the establishment on the grounds that XX are naturally morally correct, so seeing one used to promote right-wing causes feels like exploiting an overlooked loophole to trigger an “infinite lèse majesté glitch.” But mostly because she’s cute.
.
By the way, your “having women lead men is disgusting” just sounds like mate suppression/incel ick, so you might want to look to that.
You make some great points. The men are on the front lines. Like Joan d'Arc, we women are the banner. Lots of mean do speak out but they do not get the same attention as do the women. Vincent James. Marcus Follin. Carl Benjamin. Sonny Thomas. Paul Wagner. If you don't recognize these men, learn.
Female figures have been the avatars of ideas for a very long time. "Lady justice" is a female personification of law, and existed even when the field was exclusively men. In no way does she indicate that women should be running the judicial system.
I think Amelia is a creature like that. A muse. She doesn't indicate that women should be taking a stand and doing what she does in the memes... she's just doing what female personifications have done for centuries - represent an idea while looking pretty (probably, at least partially, to help make the idea naturally more attractive, though I think there's a lot more to the whole female allegory thing that I don't understand.)
She's also deliciously ironic, because the leftists designed and wrote her. A character created by the right wingers doesn't have any of the power that Amelia does, because she was theirs and they accidentally created a sweetheart for their enemies. That kind of symbol has power, and that's why the memes are flowing like wine.
The flesh and blood women acting as the face of resistance and revolution is wrong - I agree with you completely there. But when it comes to symbolic images that take female form, I think that is something else entirely.
Great points
I agree absolutely. Splendidly said.
Thought provoking. As someone who has not been shy about discussing the need for men to be out in front of women and protecting them, I largely agree, although I think there are far more men than President Trump attempting to lead on these issues. And he isn’t even really a conservative.
Couple of random thoughts:
When men attempt to lead on these issues, they are widely discounted, decried as preservers of the “patriarchy,” and thus ignored. We live in a time when people think you have nothing relevant to say to an issue unless you belong to the group being most affected. It’s why, for example, pro-life men like me are dismissed because we “don’t have a uterus and thus cannot speak to such matters.” It makes it far more difficult for conservative men to get the attention and traction necessary to be heard.
I think this may be why conservatives have pivoted to women to be the face of the “counter-resistance,” if you will. Not saying it’s right; but it is a strategy. And it does make logical sense in the modern context. Of course, it adopts a false paradigm itself — that we are all members of a group that is either oppressor or oppressed and only the oppressed have authority to speak to their situation.
But men — to your point — must be willing to repeatedly charge into the arena anyway. I see many that do (but they get very little widespread attention).
Women in combat? Absolutely not. And that includes flying planes.
Abortion? Murder. Doesn’t matter who you are.
Males in female sports? No way. We are built very differently and it’s dangerous for women/girls.
Women as ass kicking gladiators in movies/TV? Huh uh. 🙄 It feeds dangerous delusions.
Men in women’s spaces? Nope. There are countless predators out there seeking to harm women, and even the innocent ones are encroaching in a way that makes women feel emotionally and physically unsafe.
Modern Feminism? Destructive philosophy that must be destroyed.
Pornography, human trafficking, physical abuse of women? Put a stop to it. All of it.
Once more, into the breach!
Aren't womens bodies better for flying combat planes? They are smaller and have higher g-force resistance.
Well, actually, I think the research is a mixed bag on that and inconclusive. Men’s better upper body and neck strength make them better capable of keeping their head upright against the strain of high Gs and higher muscle mass helps with sustained muscle strain.
But the point isn’t whether a woman CAN do it; it’s about whether we SHOULD be putting them in harms way. What kind of society are we if we throw women out in front of men in combat? If we expose them to risk of capture, death, and maiming?
The best part about Amelia is the UK government used her to push anti conservative rhetoric and it completely backfired. Conservative girls can learn a lot about this. I keep telling women about the odd obsession trad men have with the liberal feminine look and no one understands it... literally went viral.
Amelia is great - the spirit and the irony. However, in real life, I would steer men far away from the liberal feminine look. If Amelia was a real woman she would bring trouble into a man’s life. I understand what you are saying, there’s sexual energy in the Amelia persona, but in real life she is undisciplined, neurotic, and rebellious, so, there’s that.
Youre making too many assumptions based on insecurities and on a fictional character, while negating the rebellion occurring in conservative women, too. If men like that look and you refuse to have it, then you are being rebellious and you too are beinf insolent against men.
Please clarify. I’m a bit confused by what you’re saying, but interested.
Its self explanatory. You are telling men to steer away.... attraction doesnt work that way. It's not logical. What is logical is your choice to deny men what they like.
I look young but im not. Just because youre Christian and keep your regular hair color... it doesn't mean youre not insolent. Based on what you are writing, just a load of assumptions, youre insolent yourself. Your conservative values are absolutely useless if youre arguing with men and not following their lead and knowingly denying them what they like.
"Amelia" exists because most men need to feel inspired by women, to go to war. And because half the women have gone over to the enemy.
Megha sends me to war all the time. On my free time, I'm doing nothing but boats n hoes.
I believe Amelia to be a lot like Joan of Arc - as in, she's a female voice leading the masses, an idea, in that much like Joan wasn't seen by majority of frenchmen at the time personally but represented a movement of freemen, in the same way Amelia is a personalized idea of someone influencing people to move and fight. It's not like she could be an actual leader, she is an idea and that's all she'll ever be, a symbol.
Amelia is a psyop to get men to stick their heads above the parapet. No thank-you, we haven’t been maligned for decades by the likes of Amelia to all of a sudden be fooled by her trad conversion when things get hot. No, we will be patient and bide our time and when the system collapses we will rise.
Marvelous to say, Amelia appeared on the scene (or, should I say 'screen') in a week when I listened to the episodes of 'The Rest is History' that told the story of Joan of Arc.
Yes, but Amelia is a personification - like Britannia’s granddaughter. Plus hypothetical based girls are traditionally important for morale, as it’s nice to think someone really appreciates the sacrifices made to resist.
Of course, we’re not the same as WWII veterans, but the struggle is still a struggle.
Men are walking away, from the crazy feminist women and from society. They are finally going Galt, and when society collapses we will be rid of all this nonsense because all the crazy feminists will be Darwin Award winners. They have already lost, they are just too stupid to understand it yet.
As for Amelia, I find the whole thing to be hilarious, and a sure sign that we have already won.
Amelia Becomes Prime Minister
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEuvQNUDUBc
Also some Dirty Harry for good measure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rcIJIWqYmo
Immediate unsubscribe after reading this. Just blatant lies you are spewing. It's ok to have an opinion, not ok to spew lies.
John Carter did a great piece on where this entire Amelia meme started.
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/amelia-sans-merci
I think that in the case of Amelia, it was more “counter-establishment” and funny -- at least to begin with.
https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/amelia-pathways
*****
Amelia is a supporting character in the U.K. government-funded educational visual novel Pathways, a game developed by Shout Out UK to teach the youth about extremism and radicalization. In the game, Amelia is depicted as a far-right anti-immigration activist with purple hair, a pink dress, a purple sweater and a goth or e-girl appearance, who tries persuading the protagonist to join her cause. The video game was purportedly released in 2023 and generated online discourse in January 2026 as far-right social media users reclaimed the character as their own, inspiring positive fan art and memes based around Amelia.
In 2023, Shout Out UK, a company focused on spreading media literacy, political literacy and more via their training programs, released the visual novel "interactive learning package," Pathways. The game was funded by Prevent, a program of the British government's Home Office.
In the game, players take on the role of a character named Charlie in six different scenarios dealing with online or in-person radicalization.
Scenario two features the character Amelia, a far-right, purple-haired goth girl with anti-immigration views who tries to recruit Charlie into joining anti-immigration groups and protesting against immigration.
*****
The female aspect of it is more coincidental than purposeful I believe, as the character was originally part of a propaganda campaign "to teach the youth about extremism and radicalization," however it backfired spectacularly -- as many people who played the game -- agreed with the anti-immigrant message pushed by the Amelia character. 🤣
The reason I see Amelia not going away anytime soon, is because *she’s quite literally everything that the left can’t effectively propagandize against.*
The Amelia meme has an heir of truthfulness to it -- and it’s funny.
The left hates humor as they are *always* serious, and always *very serious indeed.*
I think we’re going to be seeing Amelia a lot more, and perhaps even an American version. She can go on about the Somali Daycare Pirates™ and other immigration-based institutional fraud schemes in the US. 😉👉
Here’s a link to the meme video:
https://substack.com/@ogre/note/c-201014995?utm_source=activity_item
I am old and not plugged into the Gen Z-eitgeist, so I had to have this emergent phenomenon explained to me by the always-brilliant John Carter at Postcards from Barsoom: https://substack.com/inbox/post/184828993
Geez, you people are still talking about Charlie Kirk? No one cared about him, and if anything you people made fun of his "milquetoast conservatism" right up until he was killed.
Also that poor woman in Minnesota was shot through her side window by a cowardly, poorly-trained ICE agent. Did you even watch the video? You should be ashamed.
He wouldn't have been publicly assassinated then mocked in countless videos by extreme leftists if he was unimportant. His accounts had enough followers and views to prove that many people approved of his content. His boomer conservatism as a millennial wasn't that off-putting to other Christian conservatives.
As for Renee Good, I found the first shot 100% justified. The other 3 shots did seem like excessive force. I personally don't attend protests because I'm aware of the risks involving law enforcement, counter-protesters, and rioting (molotovs, property damage, and theft). She and her wife took that risk, and then she experienced a negative consequence.
I honestly believe that she thought her "white privilege" would protect her political stance. There's a lot of political fatigue around left-wing protesting in the US. Everyone is fair game now, including women. 🎯 And, no, this isn't something I would ever want, but this is a result of years of trying to prove that women are equal to men. Well, it succeeded.
I think Amelia is cute. Also, the Left uses foids as tools of the establishment on the grounds that XX are naturally morally correct, so seeing one used to promote right-wing causes feels like exploiting an overlooked loophole to trigger an “infinite lèse majesté glitch.” But mostly because she’s cute.
.
By the way, your “having women lead men is disgusting” just sounds like mate suppression/incel ick, so you might want to look to that.
Why not have a man and a woman as avatars of ideas? Showing a united from, each having the back of the other. Being a team.
You make some great points. The men are on the front lines. Like Joan d'Arc, we women are the banner. Lots of mean do speak out but they do not get the same attention as do the women. Vincent James. Marcus Follin. Carl Benjamin. Sonny Thomas. Paul Wagner. If you don't recognize these men, learn.